Property Tax Guide For The Georgia Taxpayer
Taxpayer Bill
of Rights
(SB 177, Act 431, 1999 Session)
Act 431 was signed April 30, 1999 with a January 1, 2000 effective date.
The bill has two main thrusts: (1) prevention of indirect
tax increases resulting from increases to existing property
values in county due to inflation,
(2) an enhancement of an individual property owner's
rights when objecting to and appealing an increase made
by a county board of tax assessors to the value of the
owner's property.
When Digest
Value Increased by Reassessments
The Revenue Commissioner has developed new rules and
regulations that became effective on November 14, 2000,
to implement the terms and provisions of Act 431.
Each year there are two types of value increases made
to a county tax digest, increases due to inflation, and
increases due to new or improved properties. The new
law imposes no additional requirements if the levying
authority (county commissioners, local school board,
or city council) rolls back the millage rate each year
to offset any inflationary increases in the digest. If
it does not, a local levying authority must notify the
public that taxes are being increased.
Local levying authorities would include the county governing
authorities, school boards and municipal governing authorities.
The Revenue Commissioner will not authorize the collection
of taxes on any digest without a showing by the official
submitting the digest that the local levying authorities
have complied with the new law.
When the total digest of taxable property is prepared,
Georgia Law requires that a rollback millage rate must
be computed that will produce the same total revenue
on the current year's new digest that last year's millage
rate would have produced had no reassessments occurred.
If the county elects to set their millage rate higher
than the rollback rate, then the new law imposes some
new requirements. The new requirements are to hold three
public hearings, place notices of the increase in the
paper and issue press releases.
The levying authority must hold three public hearings
allowing the public input into the proposed increase
in taxes. Two of these public hearings may coincide with
other required hearings associated with the millage rate
process, such as the public hearing required by O.C.G.A
Section 36-81-5 when the budget is advertised, and the
public hearing required by O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-32 when
the millage rate is finalized. One of the three public
hearings must begin between 6:00 PM and 7:00 PM in the
evening.
The levying authority must publish
a notice in the paper one week in advance of each of these
three public hearings.
The levying authority must issue a release to the press
explaining its intent to increase the taxes.
Act 431 significantly increased the rights of property
owners whose values are changed by the board of tax assessors.
The highlights of these changes are listed below.
The change of assessment
notice must give the property owner a name and telephone
number of a knowledgeable person to call if they have
questions about the value change or appeal procedures.
If the increase exceeds 15%, the notice must include
a simple, non-technical explanation of the basis for
the change along with a statement informing the property
owner that they may view, or have inexpensive copies
made of those tax records used by the assessors to determine
the value change.
When a property owner elects to assert a position as
the basis for their appeal and the board of tax assessors
rejects this position, the board must include in their
rejection notice back to the property owner the grounds
for the rejection. Thereafter, the board of tax assessors
must stick to those grounds and not assert new grounds
later in the appeal process. If the property owner asserts
a new position, the board of tax assessors may assert
new grounds for rejecting the new position.
When the board of tax assessors changes the value returned
by a property owner, the new law places on the board
the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence,
the validity of the change. This burden continues to
be on the assessors even if the appeal goes to superior
court, although the judge is not bound to either the
assessors' or the property owner's value when determining,
or having determined by a jury, the question of final
value.
If the board of equalization, which hears property owner
appeals, schedules the appeal at a time inconvenient
to the property owner, Act 431 permits a one time option
for the owner to request a different and more convenient
time, even one occurring as early as 8:00 AM or as late
as 7:00 PM. This property owner accommodation is extended
to the superior court proceeding, should the appeal go
that far, where the owner may request a hearing at a
convenient time.
In certain instances, the property owner may recover
court costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred in
the appeal hearing before the superior court. The property
owner could recover these costs and fees if the court
finds the final value to be 85% or less (80% for commercial
property) of the board of equalization's determination
of value. This would not apply, however, if the property
owner had failed to return the property for taxation.
The property owner has the right under Act 431 to make
an audio recording of any conversations with assessors
or appraisers when such recordings are relative to the
owner's assessment, appeal, arbitration or related proceedings.
The owner must provide his or her own equipment.
The new law provides for the tax commissioner,
assisted by the board of tax assessors, to develop and
make available an informational brochure that explains
the county's property tax laws and procedures. This brochure
will contain information about exemptions and preferential
assessment programs available in the county along with
instructions on how to apply. The brochure will be available
in the tax offices and will also be mailed to individuals
purchasing property. If the Legislature creates a new
exemption or preferential assessment program, the brochure
will be mailed to everyone who may be eligible for the
new program. |